Skip to main content

Pakistan-India Tension in the Wake of Pulwama Attack

Pakistan is united under the leadership of Imran Khan.
 "Nearly all men can stand adversity but if you want to test a man's character give him power." These are the very famous words said by Abraham Lincoln. Now, as far as Imran Khan's character is concerned, he has fought adversity throughout his life. He has faced the most difficult situations but now one of the  most dangerous things that corrupt people –power– is in Imran's hands.  instead of overplaying politics on the issue —Pulwama attack —Imran has asked India to provide actionable evidence and we will take action. He is showing us the gap between real statesman and cunning politician.  On the other hand, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has blamed Pakistan without any evidence. It is surprising that India has so strong intelligence network that they can find out the culprit in few hours then it would be better that if they stop the attack  in the first place. If they had so much power of intelligence sharing then they should have stopped the attacker from entering in Kashmir. India must provide the link of communication between Pakistan and attacker.Actually the young man was humiliated and ridiculed by the Indian forces and the young man just carried the burden on his heart. He was searching for the suitable occasion to take revenge. 
It is understandable truth that when you suppress someone when you deny their fundamental rights then the violence erupts because it is the hopelessness which generates violence. A pakistani based organisation has claimed responsibility. Indian need to understand that this organisation is proscribed in Pakistan.It has been band and so it has no activity in Pakistan. Moreover Pakistan is going to curb violent extremism and country has sacrificed more than 70000 soldiers and Pakistani citizens. Then again it is on India's shoulders to shake hands with Pakistan that is why Prime Minister Imran Khan said that it is Naya Pakistan and we want a new relationship, in fact a healthy relationship between Pakistan and India.He categorically mentioned that the past should be buried. We need to focus on present. War between both countries isn't a solution but a gigantic problem in itself.
    This incident might provide an opportunity to both Pakistan and India, the opportunity to restart this peace process, the opportunity to build a good relations just like South Korea and North Korea did few months ago. Modi's warmongering policy may earn him success in upcoming general elections but it will leave very destructive impact on entire region. Two nuclear-powers,  God forbid, if engage in a war,can destroy the peace and stability of the globalised world. 


Just like Imran Khan has asked for peace, Modi should come up with the same intention i. e new foreign policy. To cut a long story short, almost all the human beings present on the planet earth agree that there is nothing as bad as war;war leads to destruction and devastation? Peace between Pakistan and India is inevitable. I think we should stop spi
lling more blood and start dialogue. By achieving peace and tolerance, Pakistan and India can start trade which will help them fight poverty, corruption  malnutrition and extremism.
As the great man Martin Luther King, Jr once said" I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word. "
Written by Abdul Muqset 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Current Religious tolerance level in Pakistan and India

On both sides of Radcliffe line, minorities are brutally exploited. Seeds of hatred are deeply rooted in the unfortunate land of subcontinent. India's extremist tendencies under the grab of secularism are crystal clear. In fact India never was a secular state. While on other side of the border, though harsh for many, minorities are forcefully converted. They are treated as third class citizens. They aren't given jobs  on the basis of their abilities. Their faith determines their fate. Why don't we try to spread peace, love and tolerance? This question haunts the minds of every sane individual living on both sides of the boarder. In India, Muslims cannot perform certain rituals. Notwithstanding they own India as their motherland,their association is linked to Pakistan. It is argued by liberal school of thought that the division based on two nation theory can never be justified. They argue that hindus and Muslims had been living in subcontinent for hundreds of years w...

Issues of the Third World (Pakistan)

Since evolution of civic life on the planet Earth human beings have been facing innumerable issues. Nature of such issues vary from country to country. To be more precise, the variation directly depends on the status of the country. As far as feminism is concerned, intensity of its propagation changes with change in geographical boundaries. In third world countries like Pakistan, idea of feminism does not hold ground when compared with issues that geoparadise their survival. Therefore, it is quite evident that third deals with more severe and serious issues than feminism. The third world countries do not have access to the basic necessities of life. A major piece of evidence is that majority of the third world countries struggle to get clean water and food. There are economic and security issues. Moreover, malnutrition, corruption and misuse of natural resources  further the miseries of underdeveloped nations. Leadership has not been able to deliver their promises because of incomp...

Economy of Pakistan

Pakistan's economy was developing during first forty years of its formation while its decline since 90s is crystal clear. Holding just one factor responsible isn't a wise approach. Various factors contributed in her deteriorating economic condition. Relation between market and state is upside-down. Market allocates resources while state equitably distributes them. In Pakistan, both state and market are under the clutches of few elite families. Democracy in Pakistan is used  just to  cover the dynastic politics of few haves. Political parties are headed by one family; dissent in parties isn't tolerated at all. Biradri system dominates the electoral politics. Politicians manage to grab the votes en bloc rather than enfranchise.  That's why same families rule over the downtrodden masses. Then military intervention and imbalance between civil-military relations during democratic government further worsen the situation. At the end all the burde falls on the weak and dow...